Delta
New Member
Posts: 27
|
Post by Delta on May 14, 2016 21:31:48 GMT -6
I'd prefer to pick up where we left off yesterday, unless you have a good reason for voting Quebec. vote DeltaStill want that target list. If you were interested in where we left off last night, your vote would be on somebody other than me...Oscar. Votes were removed from me after I claimed.
|
|
India
New Member
Posts: 28
|
Post by India on May 14, 2016 21:34:00 GMT -6
I'd prefer to pick up where we left off yesterday, unless you have a good reason for voting Quebec. vote DeltaStill want that target list. Ninja'd by four minutes. Take your vote off unless you have a good reason for it. Not answering you on demand doesn't cut it. Not how this works. Three of us expressed interest in you last phase (myself, Echo, and Charlie). You claim to be a character dead at the time of the arc we're apparently in. You've targeted somebody who's turned up dead twice. You left your vote with an admitted neutral. None of those things is very much on their own, but put them all together and I've got some mild interest in you. Throw on this demand to remove my vote without really offering anything to persuade me? That takes it from mild to spicy.
|
|
India
New Member
Posts: 28
|
Post by India on May 14, 2016 21:35:21 GMT -6
I'd prefer to pick up where we left off yesterday, unless you have a good reason for voting Quebec. vote DeltaStill want that target list. If you were interested in where we left off last night, your vote would be on somebody other than me...Oscar. Votes were removed from me after I claimed. I mean, I could vote for the dead guy, but it seems a little counter-productive.
|
|
Delta
New Member
Posts: 27
|
Post by Delta on May 14, 2016 21:37:16 GMT -6
Ninja'd by four minutes. Take your vote off unless you have a good reason for it. Not answering you on demand doesn't cut it. Not how this works. Three of us expressed interest in you last phase (myself, Echo, and Charlie). You claim to be a character dead at the time of the arc we're apparently in. You've targeted somebody who's turned up dead twice. You left your vote with an admitted neutral. None of those things is very much on their own, but put them all together and I've got some mild interest in you. Throw on this demand to remove my vote without really offering anything to persuade me? That takes it from mild to spicy. Lol. "I want his target list." Full target list provided. "You're not offering anything." Read, dude.
|
|
India
New Member
Posts: 28
|
Post by India on May 14, 2016 21:37:24 GMT -6
I'd prefer to pick up where we left off yesterday, unless you have a good reason for voting Quebec. vote DeltaStill want that target list. POST 2 I JK'd Quebec two nights ago. I showed up in the write-up speaking with Mother. Mother speaks with underlined text. Mother then killed someone else later on. I believe Mother to be a self-guiding Serial Killer. Choose or don't choose. Honestly, India, you're next on my scum list anyway. You and Sierra. Didn't we have two people silenced yesterday, though? So if you hit Mother, and you can't have silence without jailkeep, would that actually silence her? I guess being self-guided might still count as being hit by the jailkeep even if the kill still went through...
|
|
Delta
New Member
Posts: 27
|
Post by Delta on May 14, 2016 21:38:59 GMT -6
If you were interested in where we left off last night, your vote would be on somebody other than me...Oscar. Votes were removed from me after I claimed. I mean, I could vote for the dead guy, but it seems a little counter-productive. My point was that my claim seemed to satisfy most people yesterday but you're looking to use me to contorol today after the new vote target yesterday turned up scum. With no evidence on me, that reads scummy.
|
|
India
New Member
Posts: 28
|
Post by India on May 14, 2016 21:39:16 GMT -6
Not how this works. Three of us expressed interest in you last phase (myself, Echo, and Charlie). You claim to be a character dead at the time of the arc we're apparently in. You've targeted somebody who's turned up dead twice. You left your vote with an admitted neutral. None of those things is very much on their own, but put them all together and I've got some mild interest in you. Throw on this demand to remove my vote without really offering anything to persuade me? That takes it from mild to spicy. Lol. "I want his target list." Full target list provided. "You're not offering anything." Read, dude. For some reason I was thinking we were later in the game than Day 5, meaning there were still nights unaccounted for. Your spicyness is back to mildness. Mea culpa. change vote: Quebec
|
|
India
New Member
Posts: 28
|
Post by India on May 14, 2016 21:42:11 GMT -6
I mean, I could vote for the dead guy, but it seems a little counter-productive. My point was that my claim seemed to satisfy most people yesterday but you're looking to use me to contorol today after the new vote target yesterday turned up scum. With no evidence on me, that reads scummy. Again, Charlie and Echo also asked questions of you after your claim last phase (alignment and target list, respectively). (sidenote - I miss multiquote) Also, I'm a moron who can't read good or count none.
|
|
Delta
New Member
Posts: 27
|
Post by Delta on May 14, 2016 21:44:27 GMT -6
My point was that my claim seemed to satisfy most people yesterday but you're looking to use me to contorol today after the new vote target yesterday turned up scum. With no evidence on me, that reads scummy. Again, Charlie and Echo also asked questions of you after your claim last phase (alignment and target list, respectively). (sidenote - I miss multiquote) Also, I'm a moron who can't read good or count none. I get jumpy over stupid things, so I guess we're cool? My bad. I did deliberately not post my targets yesterday but I couldn't well say so. I wanted to not act last night and see what happened, because the back to back lucking into kill targets freaked me out. That it was being asked also furthered my reasons to protect myself last night. Hopefully this makes sense and clears things up.
|
|
Romeo
Junior Member
Posts: 65
|
Post by Romeo on May 14, 2016 22:45:30 GMT -6
OH CRAP.
Sorry, it's a late night here at work, and I just finally focused on the write-up.
Sierra targeted Oscar last night. He may not be the only one who did, but that makes him a good shot at being Mother.
Although a big problem is Green And White Lady with the Janitor Gun. Could easily be Quebec.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie on May 14, 2016 23:02:57 GMT -6
I'd be fine voting for any of these Three: Oscar. India. Charlie. I have various reasons, all post and voting based, for each of them. Someone pick a direction or go no lynch a third day in a row. Fine by me. Why am I on this list?
|
|
|
Post by Quebec on May 15, 2016 0:33:31 GMT -6
You want me to claim? Because I'll give you one:
I'm Demiurge, a grown up Wiccan from an alternate future. I'm an inventor, and I'm town.
|
|
Gulf
New Member
Posts: 13
|
Post by Gulf on May 15, 2016 1:22:17 GMT -6
Vote: QuebecI'm glad to see that Mother killed last night, honesty. For entirely selfish reasons, you see. I was worried that I was actually her since I had twice RB'd her kill target. I RB'd Lima n2. I did not RB last night, or the first night, and used a defensive power instead. N1 because n1 is random, and last night because I thought not answering would've looked bad. Still better than saying I targeted Lima though... My connection to the proboards is via my phone, and I am currently dealing with a spammy redirect, so I will not be terribly active over the weekend. My apologies in advance, I will check in as often as I can. This strikes me as an odd conclusion to come to. I understand how the coincidence of targeting the same people as Mother would be quite freaky, but if you were her, that would've been stated in your role.
|
|
Delta
New Member
Posts: 27
|
Post by Delta on May 15, 2016 7:06:18 GMT -6
Vote: QuebecI'm glad to see that Mother killed last night, honesty. For entirely selfish reasons, you see. I was worried that I was actually her since I had twice RB'd her kill target. I RB'd Lima n2. I did not RB last night, or the first night, and used a defensive power instead. N1 because n1 is random, and last night because I thought not answering would've looked bad. Still better than saying I targeted Lima though... My connection to the proboards is via my phone, and I am currently dealing with a spammy redirect, so I will not be terribly active over the weekend. My apologies in advance, I will check in as often as I can. This strikes me as an odd conclusion to come to. I understand how the coincidence of targeting the same people as Mother would be quite freaky, but if you were her, that would've been stated in your role. There have been hidden elements of roles before, including people who were told they were one role and were actually another. Including the SK.
|
|
Delta
New Member
Posts: 27
|
Post by Delta on May 15, 2016 8:11:22 GMT -6
Unusual as all heck, but not unprecedented.
|
|
India
New Member
Posts: 28
|
Post by India on May 15, 2016 8:12:46 GMT -6
You want me to claim? Because I'll give you one: I'm Demiurge, a grown up Wiccan from an alternate future. I'm an inventor, and I'm town. Didn't Mike already claim inventor?
|
|
Mike
New Member
Posts: 37
|
Post by Mike on May 15, 2016 9:08:44 GMT -6
You want me to claim? Because I'll give you one: I'm Demiurge, a grown up Wiccan from an alternate future. I'm an inventor, and I'm town. Didn't Mike already claim inventor? I'm a pseudo inventor... I'll full claim. As Romeo deduced, I'm Prodigy. I'm not an inventor, but I have access to people who have various powers, but I can only use them once and I can only choose from 2 or 3 to use each day. Vote: Quebec I'd like to hear some actions.
|
|
Mike
New Member
Posts: 37
|
Post by Mike on May 15, 2016 9:09:31 GMT -6
Also, I was one of the two silenced yesterday. I'm having fun and paying attention. I just couldn't participate yesterday
|
|
India
New Member
Posts: 28
|
Post by India on May 15, 2016 9:28:31 GMT -6
Also, I was one of the two silenced yesterday. I'm having fun and paying attention. I just couldn't participate yesterday I figured you were silenced, since you've been pretty alive. Quebec was confirmed as the other silenced person, correct? Also, that's 4/7 on Quebec, for anybody wondering.
|
|
Mike
New Member
Posts: 37
|
Post by Mike on May 15, 2016 9:37:37 GMT -6
That should be enough votes on Quebec for now. Any more and there could be a rush on them.
|
|
|
Post by Quebec on May 15, 2016 11:59:43 GMT -6
Didn't Mike already claim inventor? I'm a pseudo inventor... I'll full claim. As Romeo deduced, I'm Prodigy. I'm not an inventor, but I have access to people who have various powers, but I can only use them once and I can only choose from 2 or 3 to use each day. Vote: Quebec I'd like to hear some actions. Sure thing. N1: Cop Sierra (town). N2: Track Mike (targeted Charlie). N3: Misdirect Tango. N4: Doctor Romeo.
|
|
Echo
Junior Member
Posts: 56
|
Post by Echo on May 15, 2016 15:55:21 GMT -6
Yeah, we seem well on the way to the town getting curb-stomped. POST 3: Charlie, you were on that list for a couple reasons. The post above. How would you know, with 3 janitorings at the time, that they were all townies? Just seemed like a drive-by post with no new information and the assumption that all these kills are townies. Mafia, however, would know the town was getting massacred because they are the ones getting all of the janitored info. You also have been buddying Romeo for days. As far as Quebec and the Jailkeep/Silence thing. Mother could very well be a self-guiding SK. That guide would get her through night effects like a Jailkeep. That guide would NOT get her through day-effects like Silencing. That's why my vote is still on Quebec. Demiurge? Do we like that claim? Inventor? Do we like that claim? How do we feel about Sierra with Quebec's "copping". I only have one post left, so I will save it to change vote if I have to. Last. If I had a suspected scum list now it would be: Papa Gulf
|
|
Romeo
Junior Member
Posts: 65
|
Post by Romeo on May 15, 2016 16:06:18 GMT -6
We need to hear from Sierra.
|
|
Romeo
Junior Member
Posts: 65
|
Post by Romeo on May 15, 2016 16:47:19 GMT -6
So we know Kilo misdirected Mike on Night 2. Mike thought he'd targeted Foxtrot for an alignment-copping. Quebec is saying that he targeted Charlie, and Mike's result was 'Neutral.'
Demiurge seems like an odd choice to be separate from Wiccan, as the whole thing revolves around Wiccan becoming Demiurge, but again, this is a really meta and weird arc, and we're stretching a bit beyond its confines.
Still, Vote: Sierra.
|
|
Mike
New Member
Posts: 37
|
Post by Mike on May 15, 2016 16:56:19 GMT -6
Remove vote
Agreed.
Vote: Sierra
It's unfortunate that we still haven't heard from a handful of people today.
|
|
India
New Member
Posts: 28
|
Post by India on May 15, 2016 17:22:01 GMT -6
So I'm guessing we don't think much of Quebec's copping of Sierra?
|
|
Mike
New Member
Posts: 37
|
Post by Mike on May 15, 2016 17:30:15 GMT -6
Remove vote
|
|
Mike
New Member
Posts: 37
|
Post by Mike on May 15, 2016 17:31:13 GMT -6
Vote: Quebec
Sorry for being so wishy-washy. We still haven't heard from quite a few people and we very well may not hear from them today, so my vote stays on the next-best thing in my eyes. For now, at least.
|
|
Romeo
Junior Member
Posts: 65
|
Post by Romeo on May 15, 2016 17:33:19 GMT -6
Unless anyone wants to admit to MDing me, Sierra targeted Oscar, and Oscar is dead, and Mother killed him, and Sierra hasn't said or done much of anything this whole game. I'm sticking with that route.
|
|
Echo
Junior Member
Posts: 56
|
Post by Echo on May 15, 2016 18:27:23 GMT -6
Post FOUR:
Final Post.
Vote Sierra
Goodnight.
|
|