Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 15:02:04 GMT -6
Remove Vote
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 15:13:05 GMT -6
There is a slight balance. The mafia will generally go after confirmed townies. Letting us know who is a townie essentially puts a bullseye on their head.
Then again, the mafia knows who is not mafia. It would be helpful if the town knew someone that was not mafia as well. I get not sharing, its a balancing act.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 15:21:38 GMT -6
There is a slight balance. The mafia will generally go after confirmed townies. Letting us know who is a townie essentially puts a bullseye on their head. Then again, the mafia knows who is not mafia. It would be helpful if the town knew someone that was not mafia as well. I get not sharing, its a balancing act. Which is pretty much the reason for me withholding the rest of my info. As I look back at this day, I think to myself that if I would have only voted for Liquor, I would not have had to spill all of my info. I'm not sure if we are better off voting for someone off of nothing or voting no lynch at this point. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 15:26:30 GMT -6
Wow, apparently I can't formulate sentences on my phone. ^
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 15:32:15 GMT -6
There is a slight balance. The mafia will generally go after confirmed townies. Letting us know who is a townie essentially puts a bullseye on their head. Then again, the mafia knows who is not mafia. It would be helpful if the town knew someone that was not mafia as well. I get not sharing, its a balancing act. Which is pretty much the reason for me withholding the rest of my info. As I look back at this day, I think to myself that if I would have only voted for Liquor, I would not have had to spill all of my info. I'm not sure if we are better off voting for someone off of nothing or voting no lynch at this point. According to the Members page, Liquor checked in 11 hours ago and the thread opened 18 hours ago. Liquor had a chance to post and decided to skate by. That is enough for me to vote for a lynch. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 15:33:53 GMT -6
How much longer do we have in the day?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 15:36:04 GMT -6
Apologies, it's Liqueur. That makes more sense than Liquor, actually. The initial reason for voting for him was just because of this? Why was Brandy suspicious in the first place? Drinking the SK under the table is a good thing. Mafia is probably kicking themselves over that targeting now. I'm curious to hear from liqueur. Will defer to better pressure choices. vote: liqueur |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 15:37:16 GMT -6
Night writeup says it was 17 hours ago - odd that there's no exact timestamp. New proboards is weird.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 15:43:40 GMT -6
We have about 7 hours left based on the realms' timestamp. Either way Liquouer did at least load up this forum after opening without posting a word. Could be many things like busy life, or it could be coasting.
I would remove my vote with a name and power claim.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 15:54:10 GMT -6
Which is pretty much the reason for me withholding the rest of my info. As I look back at this day, I think to myself that if I would have only voted for Liquor, I would not have had to spill all of my info. I'm not sure if we are better off voting for someone off of nothing or voting no lynch at this point. According to the Members page, Liquor checked in 11 hours ago and the thread opened 18 hours ago. Liquor had a chance to post and decided to skate by. That is enough for me to vote for a lynch. From my readin, liqueur checking in 18 hours ago and the thread opened 17 hours ago. So he hasn't been online since the day started. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 15:55:39 GMT -6
Ah.
Yeah, that is probably right. Not sure where I got 11 hours from. Maybe the time "at 11".
My bad.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 15:58:11 GMT -6
According to the Members page, Liquor checked in 11 hours ago and the thread opened 18 hours ago. Liquor had a chance to post and decided to skate by. That is enough for me to vote for a lynch. From my readin, liqueur checking in 18 hours ago and the thread opened 17 hours ago. So he hasn't been online since the day started. Relying on time stamps to lynch someone is like deflating balls during the superbowl. That said, he had better post soon if there is 17 hours already gone, we don't have much time left in the day. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 16:50:45 GMT -6
So it's like cheating? I was just making the point that he hadn't been logged in and deliberately not posting.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 17:07:14 GMT -6
Its an indicator, but not cheating. Its also not the best indicator.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 17:22:22 GMT -6
Well, we've gotta do something quick, otherwise nothing is going to happen at all. I'm still curious as to why Brandy initially voted for Liqueur in the first place.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 18:28:00 GMT -6
I would prefer lynch over nothing. I like getting rid of inactive players.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 18:37:21 GMT -6
I would prefer lynch over nothing. I like getting rid of inactive players. I agree with you. Really kicking myself in the head for standing up for him earlier. Vote Liqueur |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 20:35:42 GMT -6
Might as well bring this back out before time's up
Vote Liqueur
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 20:51:06 GMT -6
I hopefully won't regret this:
Vote Liqueur
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 20:57:23 GMT -6
Hmm hmm hmm.
Liqueur has not checked in since the phase started. But the night phase lasted four and a half days, and he had the misfortune of checking in last night not long before the phase opened.
So it seems to be basically lynching someone randomly, except this train may have been started on a real reason, not just random pressure.
I feel like this is a 50/50 lynch.
I feel bad for liqueur who didn't get to defend himself, but I feel like the town needs this lynch.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 21:02:32 GMT -6
Well I'm pretty sure that's majority. Just in case: vote liqueur
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 21:28:00 GMT -6
Vote Liqueur
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 23, 2015 21:32:37 GMT -6
Hmm hmm hmm. Liqueur has not checked in since the phase started. But the night phase lasted four and a half days, and he had the misfortune of checking in last night not long before the phase opened. So it seems to be basically lynching someone randomly, except this train may have been started on a real reason, not just random pressure. I feel like this is a 50/50 lynch. I feel bad for liqueur who didn't get to defend himself, but I feel like the town needs this lynch. I see where you're coming from, which is why initially I was holding off voting until he spoke up. He's been, more or less, a victim of circumstances. I still don't see why Brandy was gunning after him in the first place. That may be something that needs to be looked at in the next day phase, depending on what Liqueur comes up as. |
|
|
|
Post by Alpha on Jun 24, 2015 0:23:26 GMT -6
Sorry for the no updates. I've been at work/family stuff all day and just got home. Will edit in a final vote Talley tomorrow. But a majority was reached.
Liqueur - Brandy, Rum, Schnapps, Ale, Wine, Mead, Bourbon, Absinthe, Cider, Tequila, Champagne
The masked man was uncharacteristically silent. Not usually one to stay mum and accept his punishment he didn't fight back or argue. He knew the world was a terrible place and his end was inevitable.
Liqueur is dead. He was Rorschach (town), masked detective from Watchmen. Also known as CaptThulkman.
Night 3 starts now.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alpha on Jun 24, 2015 0:25:48 GMT -6
Posting to lock thread. On my phone and can't seem to lock it without making a post.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alpha on Jun 25, 2015 10:29:48 GMT -6
Night 3
It was a night of mass confusion. Many interactions occurred and they happened to occur in a fashion no one could have predicted. There was disorder and chaos such that when the sun arose, for the first night since everyone's arrival, there was no body awaiting in the courtyard.
Night 3 is over and no one is dead.
15 players remain, 8 is a majority.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2015 10:40:12 GMT -6
Did anything interesting happen to anyone?
I'm guessing a mass RB. Anyone not blocked?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2015 10:43:26 GMT -6
Hmm hmm hmm
Does that sound like most people would be misdirected?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2015 10:54:37 GMT -6
Did anything interesting happen to anyone? I'm guessing a mass RB. Anyone not blocked? This is interesting to me as I did not fail. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2015 11:02:20 GMT -6
I guess mass RB as I am not an info-gatherer and the write-up states a mass something.
|
|
