|
|
Post by coconut on Oct 23, 2008 12:32:35 GMT -6
How about.... Vote: Lynch CoconutHas only posted to jump on Orange's lynch. WRONG I posted after this last writeup to say I was blocked. I'm sure someone can confirm that this is true. |
|
|
|
Post by coconut on Oct 23, 2008 12:33:54 GMT -6
Clarification: Confirm that I was blocked.
Also I have been quiet but I missed a whole day phase because i'm not used to checking this site for updates.
|
|
|
|
Post by papaya on Oct 23, 2008 12:44:00 GMT -6
How about.... Vote: Lynch CoconutHas only posted to jump on Orange's lynch. WRONG I posted after this last writeup to say I was blocked. I'm sure someone can confirm that this is true. How about that. I tried searching your name and it only came up with that one post. Or, I suck at the search feature on here. |
|
|
|
Post by plum on Oct 23, 2008 13:15:18 GMT -6
Vote: CoconutHey Plum, did you get any results last night? I have already stated that I did not get anything. That is to say, no neutrals nor mafia. |
|
|
|
Post by plum on Oct 23, 2008 13:19:18 GMT -6
WRONG I posted after this last writeup to say I was blocked. I'm sure someone can confirm that this is true. How about that. I tried searching your name and it only came up with that one post. Or, I suck at the search feature on here. I just go to the 'Message Board' section, click on the number of members and it gives me a neat little list of how many posts everyone has made. Least three posters alive are Apricot, Pear and Grapefruit. |
|
|
|
Post by banana on Oct 23, 2008 13:28:13 GMT -6
Well then wouldn't we want to go after people in the middle of the posting radar (aware that I am in this category), because the people low on the totem pole will hopefully be replaced? If we're going after low posters, the odds that they'll respond are kinda low.
|
|
|
|
Post by apple on Oct 23, 2008 14:17:43 GMT -6
Thats not a chocalate jellybean!  |
|
|
|
Post by cantaloupe on Oct 23, 2008 14:18:39 GMT -6
Well, on page 9 Cherry said that they were pretty sure who the tiny killer was. If Cherry meant they knew the player, then we should go for that person. There is a chance it is the vig, but with this little activity, the vig has a lot less to go on, and is more likely to hit a townie, if they even act at all.
The information couldn't hurt, since the mafia would most like to to keep the vig around for some extra kills.
|
|
|
|
Post by grapefruit on Oct 23, 2008 14:42:47 GMT -6
Vote: Coconut
Nothing else seems to be happening...
|
|
|
|
Post by coconut on Oct 23, 2008 15:02:32 GMT -6
Vote: CoconutNothing else seems to be happening... |
|
|
|
Post by grapefruit on Oct 23, 2008 16:20:01 GMT -6
Vote: CoconutNothing else seems to be happening... I'm the one that's come forward with my power... |
|
|
|
Post by coconut on Oct 23, 2008 16:33:05 GMT -6
Well it would do you good to actually read the thread instead of mindless badwagoning.
Remove vote
|
|
|
|
Post by pineapple on Oct 23, 2008 16:47:48 GMT -6
The only hints I've seen about powers is a hint at RBer, Cop and Blocker, and I don't remember Coco as any of them.
Personally I'm not fretting about post counts...most of the posts have been non-informative anyway.
At this point, I'd focus on folks that DIDN'T vote for Orange. We've not had a good explanation of his lawyering, and he had plenty of time to explain his role otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Post by banana on Oct 23, 2008 16:55:47 GMT -6
Orange (11) - Grapefruit, Kiwi, Coconut, Plum, Banana, Apple, Strawberry, Cantaloupe, Lemon, Pineapple, Pomegranate.
|
|
|
|
Post by pear on Oct 23, 2008 17:02:07 GMT -6
Pomegranate, did you actually get a present, or was it another easter egg?
|
|
|
|
Post by Alpha on Oct 23, 2008 17:30:15 GMT -6
Uncertain of what to do and who the trust, the rabbits opted for inactivity today, hoping the night would serve them better.
No majority was reached.
Night starts, get those PMs in!
|
|
|
|
Post by Alpha on Oct 25, 2008 15:21:28 GMT -6
Night 4
He hopped around town, hiding his special gifts. It was partly a compulsion at this point, but mostly, he liked doing it. He liked taking the time to make them, hiding them and seeing who would find them. Yes, this is the reason he did what he did and he saw no reason to stop.
_________________________
The bunny in the bow tie liked company. A lot. So much, in fact, that he was rarely ever alone. No, he always surrounded himself with the best looking woman he could find, almost always wearing practically nothing. Truly, this was a party animal. These women loved his company too, and would do practically everything he wanted. This rabbit was set for life. Tonight, he asked a special favour of his ladies. He sent them out, then sat back and adjusted his bow tie. But his ladies weren’t gone long. They soon returned. It seems something had prevented them from going out.
Curious, the rabbit hopped out himself to investigate. Sure enough, separating him from the rest of the town was something that had never been there before. He hopped, trying to find the end of it. It was during this that he was spotted. He had not been expecting an attack, and was separated from his ladies. He was cornered. His attacker picked him up by the ears and carried him into a building. He struggled, but could not get free. They walked into the kitchen, where the rabbit could see a pot on the stove. He struggled madly, but his attacker had too good of a grip. His attacker put him in the pot of water, put the lid on, weighted it down, and turned the stove to MAX.
Grapefruit is dead. He was the Playboy Bunny (Town/Playboy Magazine), bow tie wearing mascot of a well known men’s magazine. Also known as Amora’s_best_friend
16 remain, 9 is a majority
|
|
|
|
Post by cantaloupe on Oct 25, 2008 15:34:09 GMT -6
Who screwed with my action last night?
|
|
|
|
Post by plum on Oct 25, 2008 17:08:47 GMT -6
Dammit! I found another townie last night.
|
|
|
|
Post by pomegranate on Oct 25, 2008 21:24:55 GMT -6
God, how awesome is it that ABF was the Playboy Bunny?
It fits him too perfectly.
On a side note, does anyone have any good info? Or leads?
|
|
|
|
Post by cherry on Oct 25, 2008 23:05:52 GMT -6
Got nothin.
|
|
|
|
Post by cantaloupe on Oct 25, 2008 23:45:52 GMT -6
f**k it.
Vote apricot
|
|
|
|
Post by strawberry on Oct 26, 2008 0:24:40 GMT -6
Someone is losing their cool.  |
|
|
|
Post by papaya on Oct 26, 2008 7:05:10 GMT -6
I'm kind of tempted to go after coconut again, as they didn't give up any info whatsoever with a handful of votes on them.
but hey, follow the leader!
Vote:Apricot
|
|
|
|
Post by pineapple on Oct 26, 2008 8:42:10 GMT -6
I'm more suspicious of Coconut myself. I'm pretty suspicious about last night's writeup: I don't think a mason member would have casually thrown down a vote (and then been ignored).
I'll be checking today, so I will be happy to vote/hammer Apricot if that is the way it goes; both of them fail the "vote for Orange" test.
|
|
|
|
Post by peach on Oct 26, 2008 9:13:49 GMT -6
so I am voting for apricot because I will not be around to throw another vote down
vote:apricot
|
|
|
|
Post by Alpha on Oct 26, 2008 10:02:19 GMT -6
Apricot (3) - Cantaloupe, Papaya, Peach
9 is a majority
About 5 1/2 hours left.
|
|
|
|
Post by pomegranate on Oct 26, 2008 10:37:57 GMT -6
I guess someone is better than no one.
Vote: Apricot
|
|
|
|
Post by peach on Oct 26, 2008 12:38:08 GMT -6
Pomegranate....why did you target two nights ago?
|
|
|
|
Post by peach on Oct 26, 2008 13:10:10 GMT -6
the overwhelming responses in this game is simply stunning....
|
|
