|
|
Post by magenta on Jun 30, 2008 14:08:11 GMT -6
Kick ass car. When someone dies, do we find out who they really are?
|
|
|
|
Post by aqua on Jun 30, 2008 14:12:06 GMT -6
You know what? I'd actually like to go for a day one lynch. With every one's ID hidden, existing grudges don't matter, and I'd like to see what happens.
|
|
|
|
Post by white on Jun 30, 2008 14:12:57 GMT -6
Are you volunteering?  |
|
|
|
Post by red on Jun 30, 2008 14:14:08 GMT -6
vote: white
|
|
|
|
Post by white on Jun 30, 2008 14:18:15 GMT -6
Vote: Aqua
|
|
|
|
Post by black on Jun 30, 2008 14:18:21 GMT -6
lynch white 
|
|
|
|
Post by white on Jun 30, 2008 14:19:11 GMT -6
Hrm. Insert "I'm not mafia" protest here.
*shrugs*
|
|
|
|
Post by magenta on Jun 30, 2008 14:20:14 GMT -6
I don't think he was volunteering. However, it does raise my eye brow. Yes, we do not know who is who, but we might as well, be in a regular mafi game. Taking a shot at somebody completly in the dark, espically in these circumstances, is never a good thing. Also, this makes me want to throw a vote on you, so you know what, I will, for pressure. Change Vote: White
|
|
|
|
Post by aqua on Jun 30, 2008 14:21:07 GMT -6
Why is White voting for me when I didn't start the votes on him?
Whiteys got me down!
|
|
|
|
Post by magenta on Jun 30, 2008 14:21:50 GMT -6
[color-magenta]f**k, I meant Change Vote: Aqua I got confused. [/color
|
|
|
|
Post by magenta on Jun 30, 2008 14:22:29 GMT -6
d**n, not my brightest moment. 
|
|
|
|
Post by white on Jun 30, 2008 14:23:00 GMT -6
Pressure for what? A roleclaim?
You really want to out someone that can be helpful to the town the first day? So the mafia can kill them night 1?
Change Vote: Magenta
That sort of logic seems a bit of a leap, to me. I mean, really. Let's pressure someone day 1 and get them to reveal who they are... so you can find out what, exactly? Who the cop is? The doctor? I'm not saying I'm either of those roles, but I'm sure the mafia would love to find out the first day due to "pressure".
|
|
|
|
Post by white on Jun 30, 2008 14:24:09 GMT -6
Okay, this lag is annoying.
Change Vote: Aqua
For the same reasons, really. Sorry Magenta.
|
|
|
|
Post by black on Jun 30, 2008 14:25:27 GMT -6
remove vote no lynch
|
|
|
|
Post by beige on Jun 30, 2008 14:26:54 GMT -6
No lynch.
|
|
|
|
Post by red on Jun 30, 2008 14:26:56 GMT -6
Seriously?
One of you is like "Voting off a player on day one is never a good idea" and the other is like "Oh Em Gee! You'd out somebody on day 1?"
And yet, both of you are voting. Why are you voting if you don't want to lynch somebody and you don't want anybody to claim?
I'll leave my vote on White.
|
|
|
|
Post by aqua on Jun 30, 2008 14:27:45 GMT -6
Why vote for me? I'd actually like to vote for Red. I made a suggestion, or at least voice my desire to experiment, and then white made what at first seemed like a joke. But Red jumped in with a vote for white, which seemed completly serious. There is no telling how much info we will be able to get from the write-up, so we might as well get people talking and see if we can get anyone to incriminate themselves.
|
|
|
|
Post by magenta on Jun 30, 2008 14:29:31 GMT -6
That is not what I meant at all. The term pressure was siply a bad choice of words. What I wanted was an explaniation on why aqua wants to vote for someone with absloutly no info. The reason why I voted for her, was that aqua was trying to get someone lynched day one. to me, that seems like a scumish tactic. My vote stands.
|
|
|
|
Post by aqua on Jun 30, 2008 14:35:18 GMT -6
That is not what I meant at all. The term pressure was siply a bad choice of words. What I wanted was an explaniation on why aqua wants to vote for someone with absloutly no info. The reason why I voted for her, was that aqua was trying to get someone lynched day one. to me, that seems like a scumish tactic. My vote stands. Because we don't know how much info we will be able to get. I was under the impression that this game was going to be fairly bare bones. Why not at least try to get something going? |
|
|
|
Post by magenta on Jun 30, 2008 14:37:26 GMT -6
I believe some people are, against you.
|
|
|
|
Post by red on Jun 30, 2008 14:37:30 GMT -6
And yet, there you are voting.
By your own logic, we should lynch you since you are trying to lynch somebody. I'm perfectly willing to change my vote to Magenta instead of White, I just think White's reaction was just as scummy.
|
|
|
|
Post by black on Jun 30, 2008 14:40:06 GMT -6
I'm just surprised by how weird this game is getting on day 1.
|
|
|
|
Post by magenta on Jun 30, 2008 14:41:00 GMT -6
In a sense, yes. In a differeant sense, no. I'm lynching somebody, because they want to lynch somebody. I feel that this could be a scum player, who is trying to kill someone. Because I believe, with what is circumstancial evidence, that aqua is mafia, My vote is staying with aqua.
|
|
|
|
Post by beige on Jun 30, 2008 14:41:35 GMT -6
That's what happens when you don't have the familiar names to help you feel more comfortable.
And I'll wager the following:
Aqua is either scum, or not a useful role.
Vote: Aqua
|
|
|
|
Post by aqua on Jun 30, 2008 14:42:49 GMT -6
And yet, there you are voting. By your own logic, we should lynch you since you are trying to lynch somebody. I'm perfectly willing to change my vote to Magenta instead of White, I just think White's reaction was just as scummy. Who is voting? I haven't. My logic goes like this. If we vote no lynch, we lose a day. If we vote, we either get a scummie, or we lynch a townie and have something to go on the next day, IE who voted for the townie. |
|
|
|
Post by magenta on Jun 30, 2008 14:45:31 GMT -6
Red was refering to me. And with your logic, it all comes back to you. Because your the one who wanted to lynch somebody. So, it would make you look scummy. We where all fine voting no lynch, then you say you want to lynch someone. So that's what some of us are doing. I for one am voting to lynch you. If you are town, I'll be very suprised.
|
|
|
|
Post by red on Jun 30, 2008 14:46:40 GMT -6
In a sense, yes. In a differeant sense, no. I'm lynching somebody, because they want to lynch somebody. I feel that this could be a scum player, who is trying to kill someone. Because I believe, with what is circumstancial evidence, that aqua is mafia, My vote is staying with aqua. What evidence is that? That he almost voted for somebody?  |
|
|
|
Post by purple on Jun 30, 2008 14:46:49 GMT -6
vote no lynch
|
|
|
|
Post by indigo on Jun 30, 2008 14:47:04 GMT -6
Why are some colors getting pronouns already? How did we find out Aqua was Her instead of Him?
|
|
|
|
Post by aqua on Jun 30, 2008 14:48:42 GMT -6
Red was refering to me. And with your logic, it all comes back to you. Because your the one who wanted to lynch somebody. So, it would make you look scummy. We where all fine voting no lynch, then you say you want to lynch someone. So that's what some of us are doing. I for one am voting to lynch you. If you are town, I'll be very suprised. Do you like surprises? |
|
